non-employment and the creation of the vicious cycle of dependence on institutions [addiction]

Is this legal, but is it also ethical and how far can power and influence continue to be acceptable, before we claim "psychological abuse"?
Coercion is the practice of forcing another party to act in an involuntary manner by use of intimidation or threats or some other form of pressure or force. It involves a set of various types of forceful actions that violate the free will of an individual to induce a desired response, usually having a strict choice or option against a person in such a way a victim cannot escape, for example: a bully demanding lunch money to a student or the student gets beaten.
Diplomacy (from the Greek δίπλωμα, meaning making a deal with other countries) is the art and practice of conducting negotiations between representatives of states. It usually refers to international diplomacy, the conduct of international relations through the intercession of professional diplomats with regard to issues of peace-making, trade, war, economics, culture, environment, and human rights. International treaties are usually negotiated by diplomats prior to endorsement by national politicians. In an informal or social sense, diplomacy is the employment of tact to gain strategic advantage or to find mutually acceptable solutions to a common challenge, one set of tools being the phrasing of statements in a non-confrontational, or polite manner.
Flexi Bundle In its natural sense, discipline is systematic instruction intended to train a person, sometimes literally called a disciple, in a craft, trade or other activity, or to follow a particular code of conduct or "order". Often, the phrase "to discipline" carries a negative connotation. This is the case because enforcement of order is often regulated through the threat of punishment to ensure given instructions are carried out.
Sometimes power is used to the extend of making us feel "weak" or "strong" and at this point we should question whether our basic liberties are being threatened. We have the right to express ourselves, and, allowing for ethics and prudency that might avoid us being sued for libel, insults or other mannerisms that lack ethics, and, thus discipline can thus be seen as a latent influencing factor that induces fear and fear is the psychology of the hunter, terrorist and the tiger in the jungle as it eyes its prey before attacking it.
Once my boss told me I am not meeting his performance criteria over and over, and, albeit his argument was a valid criticism, I just said I will do my best given the situation and resources I have to work with, then he fired me because he figured out that he can get the job done from someone who had re-assured him he could do so within one or two days. Now I am confident that the boss does not believe anything I say, judging by his decisions, but, frankly, is this my fault? I am now free of his fears, at least.
I think there is a direct link between one's emotions and their actions and notwithstanding an academic principle echoes "objectivity" in my head, there is little evidence of objective decisions in the workplace, and, private life is much more idiosyncratic than the workplace. People gossip, lie and engage in politics, which include office politics and politics concerning the wider picture.
Sources of reference include www.wikipedia.org, and, the life story of an unfortunate guy based on a 1975 version of an Italian comedy around the life of a fictitious personality named "Ugo Fantozzi". I think that blaming and shaming tactics are warning signs of a toxic and negative person, and, thus I question, do I want to follow their footsteps or should I seek other role models in life, if I am in need of inspiration? Typical teamwork philosophy seems to assume that the word of the majority rule in an environment where decisions have to be discussed, however, sometimes, the particular situation has to be handled in the rise of valid reasons and objections raised by people if we were to be democratic and not simply remain expectant that our wish is everyone else's command. Sometimes "command theory" is not always practical and possible. I do feel guilty of being called a hypocrite or a "back stabber" sometimes, however, it seems that life has taught me to live in fear, insecurity and to try to negotiate for my individual interests first and foremost, since it is easily understood that most living beings are egoistic in their nature. Sometimes striving for collective benefit does not quite appease the majority in any case, so there is a limit on how far you can be altruistic. Some managers appear to be non-tolerant to the point of questioning whether they are psychotic, perfectionist, or typically "results-oriented" and non-caring towards people. It is commonly noticed that people use numbers to gain power, whether in office politics or in making decisions look legitimate even though they might not be ethical. Is society moving backwards in time in social sensitivity?
Internet